In what's starting to become a feature as regular as the
Unmarked Box, I continue my adventures in attempted panoramic
photography. For those joining us late, inspired by the photography
of L. L. McAllister,
I've made it an ongoing project to squeeze large panoramic
photographs out of my decidedly non-panoramic digital camera
through the intervention of my marginally formidable computer
skills and unknown reservoirs of patience. The saga continues...
|
Here's
an old panoramic photo I made awhile ago that I never
gotten around to posting, despite the fact that it was
one of my best attempts before I upgraded to new imaging
software. It's downtown Burlington, Vermont as seen
from the top of the Town Center parking garage. Black-and-white
remains easier than color to match together, and is
more in the spirit of the original McAllister photographs,
but I haven't used it as much as I probably should.
It's mostly about finding subject matter that matches
the format, but here it seems to work out fine.
|
It's
funny to think that for almost of the entire life of
DEFORGE I've relied mostly on imaging software that
was probably considered obsolete when it came free with
my first digital camera back in 1999. In some ways,
I think it's been an aesthetic decision. Much like how
certain musicians play and record only on vintage equipment
in order to pursue a distinctive sound, I've worked
at exploiting the limitations of cheap imaging software
to cobble together a unique combination of cheapness,
cluelessness, and hopeless amateurism that is this website.
However, that doesn't get me decent-looking panoramics,
so I went Costcos* and got me some modern imaging software,
the kind that takes five minutes to load and absorbs
more memory than SQL Server. However, the real question
is, "Does it make up for my shortcomings as a photographer,
artist, and possibly as a human being?" Answer,
as shown here, is "somewhat". It doesn't solve
my exposure problems, but it does give me more tools
to hide them.
This is one of the first I put together with the new
software. It's a panoramic of Colchester Pond, and even
with the advanced software, there was nothing I could
do to fix the exposure differences and also at the same
time keep some of the early Fall colors. So it was back
to the old software and a run through the "Splash"
function to hide the lines. It was certainly a start,
though. With a little time invested and the right photographs
to use, I may be able to solve this panoramic problem,
yet.
|
| As
I've said before, and will probably say again at some
point when I write the specific article for Urban
Vermonter, Lake Willoughby is a remarkably beautiful
place, even by Vermont standards. One thing I've learned
is that if I want to avoid exposure problems, I should
take into account where the sunlight is coming from.
Unfortunately, ignorance and circumstances meant that
I didn't heed that warning when I took this photo last
Fall on an unusually warm day, and exposure differences
almost kept this panoramic from happening.
One way I tried to save this panoramic was to reduce
the number of colors used, which like the "splash"
function, or any other trick that I've tried provides
a chance to hide the seams at the expense of making
the photo less photographic. When overused, it feels
like cheating, but sometimes aiming for art rather than
authenticity is a better target. In this case, I reduced
the colors too much to look like a real photograph,
but the result ended up rather well, something I might
slap on merchandise
one of these days. Actually, I did have it briefly printed
on a stein, but it wasn't the right image for the item
nor the right price point, but that's a different ramble.
|
This
particular panoramic was certainly a learning experience.
In early April of 2005 I took a series of photographs
from an overlook by St. Michael's College in Colchester,
Vermont. What I intended to do was create a panoramic
that had Mount Mansfield on one side and Camel's Hump
on the other. I took four photographs, but when I went
to stitch them together, I found that the fourth photograph
with Camel's Hump on it didn't share any overlap with
the third photo. To add insult to injury, the first
and third photo did overlap, eliminating the need for
the second photo in the series.
Yet, I managed to salvage something from this mess,
although there is some color reduction, this is the
first panoramic where I was able to eliminate exposure
differences without a significant loss of color or quality.
Too bad early Spring is a pretty blah time to take a
landscape photo in Northern Vermont. However, now that
I'm starting to figure this stuff out, I'll attempt
another from this location at some point.
|
|
Here's
the view from the top of Mount Agamenticus in Maine.
Once again, with only a minor reduction in color quality,
I was able to piece together a pretty seamless panoramic
out of three photographs. Of course, up close you can
probably still pick out the seams, but you have to look
for them. At this point, I feel that I've gotten a handle
on the technical aspects of linking digital photographs
together to build seamless panoramics. It may not be
perfect, but if I can make them good enough to withstand
scrutiny on a computer screen, I should have a good
shot of making them look good on paper, too.
However, even with all of the work I've put into this
up to this point, I've only started to catch up to where
McAllister was probably after only six months after
purchasing his camera. That is, up to speed enough on
the technology of the day to produce a decent panoramic.
But it's all downhill from here.
|
* - Translation: "I went down to Costco".
For some reason, in Vermont and other parts of New England
in the context of telling people you went to the store it's
acceptable to pluralize proper retail establishment names
and drop any sort of conjunction or preposition that may actually
help others understand what, exactly, you're talking about.
Proper names only, though, nobody says "I went malls."
Other examples include " I went Kmarts", "I
went Home Depots", and the famous but now sadly archaic,
"I went Ameses".
| |